Hylafax Mailing List Archives
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
Re: [hylafax-users] batching almost there
Am 2005.07.29 12:10 schrieb(en) offman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
but the whole point is that argument goes out of the window, because
you can schedule the time of say 50 faxes without 'jitter', just by
setting them to the same "TTS"
It is no problem to have 50 faxes scheduled at the same time. It _may_
be a problem (under certain circumstances) if a job is always requeued
in the same interval.
also the fact is that , because the "TTS" is at a milisecond level on
I think time resolution is 1 second but that doesn't matter. (see below)
the submitting of jobs, the chance of 2 remote hylafax systems :
1. having exactly the same "TTS"
2. having the same "retry time"
3. triggering the jobs at exactly the same time.
is going to be fairly remote.
Since it takes the modems some seconds to do their work the two jobs
don't need to have exactly the same TTS. I think the problem as in my
constructed example could occur when the TTS of the two jobs are only a
few seconds apart.
(My example is only a guess what the jitter may be good for.)
The other thing is i think the "jitter" is a myth!!! ( see the last
job)
I found this code in version 4.2.1:
req->tts = now + (req->retrytime != 0
? req->retrytime
: (requeueInterval>>1) + (random()%requeueInterval));
Obviously there seem to be cases when Hylafax uses requeueInterval
+/-50%, i.e. jitter.
There are other cases when Hylafax does not use intentional jitter,
e.g. when you specify a retry interval (option -I to sendfax).
Either your conditions ensure that you will not get this jitter or
maybe it occurs only in special cases.
Bodo
____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
*To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*