Hylafax Mailing List Archives
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
Re: [hylafax-users] directory structure in Debian package (Was: kill time parameter)
- To: hylafax-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hylafax-users] directory structure in Debian package (Was: kill time parameter)
- From: Bodo Meissner <bodo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:30:42 +0000
Am 2005.06.14 00:25 schrieb(en) Giuseppe Sacco:
I replied to the same message, already.
Hello Giuseppe,
I saw your answer just after sending mine.
But I think that the --bind option was never really inspected.
Until Aidan's message I did not know this option exists.
The main reason while I am reluctant is that I don't know if this
could work on any debian architecture. I checked that it works for
2.4 and 2.6 kernels. Will this work on the Hurd? What about m68k
systems with 2.2 linux kernels?
The man page of mount says:
Since Linux 2.4.0 it is possible to remount part of the file hierarchy
somewhere else. The call is mount --bind olddir newdir
No clue about Hurd.
So, it may be a good idea to switch using --bind on 4.2.2 debian
package: this would remove the dual directory stuff.
Any other comment?
The startup script could try to use "mount --bind ..." and fall back to
copying the files if that fails.
It will get more difficult if the user installs hylafax-server on a 2.2
kernel and then upgrades to a 2.4 or 2.6 kernel. Should the script
remove the files already copied? Maybe in this case the script can try
to mount --bind to a different directory and if that succeeds, remove
the copied files and mount --bind to the real target dir.
Bodo
____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
*To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*