Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.

[Joe Matuscak <matuscak@rohrer.com>]

On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Giulio Orsero wrote:

> Try producing the tiff yourself using tiffg4 or editing momentarily
> ps2fax to force tiffg4 and see if it gets better (I'm afraid HylaFAX
> will convert it to 32d).

I hacked ps2fax to force ghostscript to generate tiffg4. HylaFAX quit with
an error in the log:

Sep 06 11:31:25.37: [ 7894]: SEND file "docq/doc75.cover;70"
Sep 06 11:31:25.37: [ 7894]: REJECT: Document is not in a Group 3-compatible
format (compression 4)

Interestingly, when I manually converted the ps file the tffg4 output was
larger than the tiffg32d. Not what I would have expected.

> AFAIK, in class1, only HylaFAX is responsible about 1d 2d, so that if
> HylaFAX could do MMR the modem should be ok.

Thats a good thing. Anyone have any idea if the MMR support is planned at
all for HylaFAX?

Thanks,

Joe Matuscak
Rohrer Corporation
717 Seville Road
Wadsworth, Ohio 44281
(330)335-1541
matuscak@rohrer.com




____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null