Hylafax Mailing List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: too much delay between TCF and +FDR?



Hi,

Try switching copy quality control off.

ie something like
PercentGoodLines:       0
MaxConsecutiveBadLines:     0  

Using Couriers we used to receive an error rate of around 10% with
hylafax's copy quality on, even though the resulting fax was nearly always
received perfectly correct and legible(checked with cqtest).  The error was
consistent from certain destinations.

We now have an error rate of around 1% for received faxes.

- Robert

At 12:52 PM 2/18/99 +0000, you wrote:
>any idea what this means? can't find it in the FAQ, and we are seeing
>this a LOT! (USR Sportster)
>
>thnx
>
>Feb 18 11:59:34.56: [  333]: --> [5:ERROR]
>Feb 18 11:59:34.56: [  333]: MODEM Command error
>Feb 18 11:59:34.56: [  333]: REMOTE HANGUP: Unspecified Phase C error,
>including too much delay between TCF
>and +FDR command (code 90)
>Feb 18 11:59:34.56: [  333]: RECV FAX (00000547): recvq/fax00080.tif
>from 0171 287 2150, route to
><unspecified>, 0 pages in 0:15
>Feb 18 11:59:34.56: [  333]: RECV FAX: Unspecified Phase C error,
>including too much delay between TCF and
>+FDR command
>Feb 18 11:59:34.56: [  333]: <-- [7:AT+FKS\r]
>Feb 18 11:59:34.67: [  333]: --> [5:ERROR]
>Feb 18 11:59:34.67: [  333]: MODEM Command error
>-- 
>You can't control what knowledge workers do on their desktops.
>It's like trying to herd cats. You might as well make it as
>efficient as possible. - Kim Brown, Dataquest




Home
Report any problems to webmaster@hylafax.org

HylaFAX is a trademark of Silicon Graphics Corporation.
Internet connectivity for hylafax.org is provided by:
VirtuALL Private Host Services