Hylafax Mailing List Archives |
Jul 03 14:12:00.36: [ 887]: SESSION BEGIN 00000119 +48.22.5294888
Jul 03 14:12:00.36: [ 887]: Incoming analog call on controller 2 from 00825650494 to 4888.
Jul 03 14:12:15.30: [ 887]: Connection established.
Jul 03 14:12:15.30: [ 887]: BaudRate = 9600
Jul 03 14:12:15.30: [ 887]: Flags = MR_compr, No_ECM
Jul 03 14:12:15.30: [ 887]: Write fax in path /var/spool/fax to file recvq/fax00042.tif.
Jul 03 14:12:23.02: [ 887]: Fax received and calling '/var/spool/fax/bin/faxrcvd "recvq/fax00042.tif" "faxCAPI21" "00000119" "Connection was established but no fax data was received." "" "" "4888"'.
Jul 03 14:12:23.24: [ 887]: Connection is droped with reason 0x3490 (Normal call clearing).
I wonder what does "No_ECM" flag mean because in all cases where problem with "no fax data received" accoured flags was "No_ECM"? During sending fax from my house to office, fax machine in my house displayed message "Connection error" but in hylafax log - "Connection was established but no fax data was received."
I also attached config.faxCAPI maybe there is something wrong with this file, but repeat once again: faxes from my office are received OK
Jul 04 11:52:16.85: [20566]: SESSION BEGIN 00000140 +48.22.5294888
Jul 04 11:52:16.85: [20566]: Incoming speech call on controller 2 to 4888.
Jul 04 11:52:25.96: [20566]: Connection established.
Jul 04 11:52:25.96: [20566]: BaudRate = 14400
Jul 04 11:52:25.96: [20566]: Flags = MMR_compr
Jul 04 11:52:25.96: [20566]: Write fax in path /var/spool/fax to file recvq/fax00048_2003-06-04_11:52:25.tif.
Jul 04 11:52:53.37: [20566]: Page 1 was received.
Jul 04 11:53:07.04: [20566]: Page 2 was received. - Last Page!
Jul 04 11:53:09.74: [20566]: Fax received and calling '/var/spool/fax/bin/faxrcvd "recvq/fax00048_2003-06-04_11:52:25.tif" "faxCAPI22" "00000140" "Text:" "ID:" "Reason:" "4888"'.
Jul 04 11:53:09.94: [20566]: Connection is droped with reason 0x3490 (Normal call clearing).
Jul 04 11:53:09.94: [20566]: SESSION END
As you can see, no "No_ECM" flag is present.
What can be wrong??
Thanks,Marcin
|