Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.

[Joe Matuscak <matuscak@rohrer.com>]

On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Bernd Proissl wrote:

> I guess there is no single compression algorithm which can achive the best
> compression for all possible input data.
>
> What pattern(s) are in the ps file?
> Maybe you want to exchange a ps file to make sure you work on the same
> basis?

That does appear to be the problem. When I tried the file that I have
been testing, the tiffg4 version was larger. It does have several Windows
screen shots embeded in there. On a couple of other documents,
the g4 format was smaller.   Of course, the g4 being larger sort of
counteracts the explanation for my fax-fax times being less. Oh well.

Thanks,

Joe Matuscak
Rohrer Corporation
717 Seville Road
Wadsworth, Ohio 44281
(330)335-1541
matuscak@rohrer.com




____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null