Hylafax Mailing List Archives
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
FW: Please help me understand encoding
- To: "'Hylafax mailing list'" <flexfax@sgi.com>
- Subject: FW: flexfax: Please help me understand encoding
- From: "Mau, Jonathan" <Jonathan.Mau@nrc.ca>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 15:01:10 -0400
> Greetings:
>
Please forgive me if this is a duplicate, but there is evidence that this
did not make it to the list on the first attempt 2 days ago.
> I have been playing with HylaFAX on and off for some of months now.
> Recently, I have been doing more intensive testing and am puzzled by how
> the
> compression/encoding works. Some things lead me to believe that the modem
> does the encoding. For example from the Multitech document "Class 2 Fax
> Developer's Kit" page 23 indicates that 2-D MR and 2-D MMR are not
> supported. But then some things indicate that HylaFAX does the encoding.
> For example, from man page HYLAFAX(5F) "Documents are automatically
> converted to TIFF/F documents prior to transmission according to the
> capabilities of the remote fascimile machine: maximum page width and
> length, ability to handle 2-D encoded data, ...".
>
> Of the 15 or so numbers I have used for testing, all but 2 list their
> capabilities as "supports2DEncoding:yes", yet all the completed email
> messages indicate that 1-D encoding was used. (This is not quite true, a
> few pages were noted to have used 2-D, but that was a month ago and the
> modems used then are not the same as the ones I am using now.) The config
> man page indicates that Use2D defaults to yes and I have not explicitly
> set
> it otherwise anywhere. So why is 2-D compression not being used? I am
> sending test documents at 196lines/inch vertical resolution pages in about
> 1.5 minutes/page (granted, these are busy pages) and feel that 2-D
> encoding
> would improve this time greatly.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Thanks for all tips
>
> Jonathan