Re: flexfax: HylaFAX RPM

[Dave Parker <uw!dlparker@uunet.uu.net>]

darren.nickerson@balliol.ox.ac.uk wrote:
>
>In message <3.0.1.32.19980524155117.006d68ec@elgro.co.uk>, Phil Watkinson
write
>s:
>>
>>Hi Darren,
>>
>>There is a later rpm for HylaFAX, available in the ftp RedHat contrib
>>directory or its mirrors :
>>
>>      hylafax-4.0-8.i386.rpm  10 Feb 1998             1004409 bytes
>
>Okay, you've got me here. I've checked the Imperial College archive very
>thoroughly . . . below contrib/ all I found is:
>
>./SRPMS/hylafax-4.0-6.src.rpm
>./readmes/hylafax.README
>./hurricane/SRPMS/hylafax-4.0pl1-9.src.rpm
>./hurricane/i386/hylafax-man-4.0pl1-9.i386.rpm
>./hurricane/i386/hylafax-man-gz-4.0pl1-9.i386.rpm
>./hurricane/i386/hylafax-htmldoc-4.0pl1-9.i386.rpm
>./hurricane/i386/hylafax-4.0pl1-9.i386.rpm
>./i386/hylafax-4.0-6.i386.rpm
>./grouped/libc5/i386/Libraries/hylafax-4.0-6.i386.rpm
>./grouped/glibc/i386/Applications/Communications/hylafax-4.0pl1-9.i386.rpm

                   [...text deleted...]

>>My suggestion to start the ball rolling; could we have the patch level
in the
>>rpm filename - ie hylafax-4.0.2-9.i386.rpm ?

I haven't been following this thread very closely because I'm running
HylaFAX
4.0pl2 built from the sources on COL 1.2 with no problems, but how, other
than the lib issues, does 4.0.2-9 differ from 4.0pl2??
-- 
Dave Parker/DLP, Inc     dlparker@dlpinc00.com