Re: [hylafax-users] pagesend

[Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Tony Delov wrote:

> I've been wondering if its the way we have the modems set up?
> We have out modems connected to a stallion port server  and  a small 
> program running on the linux servers that maps a pseudo device pttya4 
> to ttya4 device?


That could very well be it, yes.  The easy way to test that would be to 
take one of those modems and connect it directly to the HylaFAX server's 
serial ports and test it there.

You may also want to review the patch on this bug report:

 http://bugs.hylafax.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425

The patch there contains lots of code changes that are unrelated to the 
bug report itself, and the patch isn't likely to apply cleanly to any 
current source code, but maybe it would give you some hints as to where 
the problem lay.

> This is  a log of Faxsend going through the the same modem as the 
> pagesend logs mentioned earlier.
> Which sends the faxes ok.
>
> May 25 11:23:52 hylafax FaxQueuer[17422]: SUBMIT JOB 141740
> May 25 11:24:02 hylafax FaxSend[17216]: MODEM set DTR OFF
> May 25 11:24:02 hylafax FaxSend[17216]: MODEM set baud rate: 0 baud 
> (flow control unchanged) 


This is very interesting.  I'd like to get to the bottom of it.  I'm 
relatively certain, however, that the only difference between FaxSend 
and PageSend initializations is that setParity call... well, at least 
I'm pretty sure that's it.

Thanks,

Lee.


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
 *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*