Re: [hylafax-users] Digital HylaFAX Solution Recommendation

["andrew rinaldi" <andrew.rinaldi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Dan.

 

Depending on what exactly you are trying to do you might find that analog will offer higher performance and greater redundancy.... some analog solutions have a dedicated CPU and DSP per port which offers significantly higher reliability when compared to a single CPU or DSP serving multiple ports.  The RockForce OCTO+ 8 port board has an MTBF of 25 years.

 

In real world testing analog often outperforms digital.

 

Regards

 

ANDREW RINALDI

Mainpine Ltd. Support

USA +1 718 701 2422 | Asia/Europe +44 1225 436137 

andrew.rinaldi@xxxxxxxxxxxx | www.mainpine.com

---

From: hylafax-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:hylafax-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dan Brummer
Sent: 27 April 2006 20:03
To: hylafax-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [hylafax-users] Digital HylaFAX Solution Recommendation

Good afternoon,

I'm currently running HylaFAX 4.1.8 on RedHat9 with a single four-port modem card.  I am looking for a better solution to my current setup that will have more redundancy and eight or more fax lines.  I'm impressed with the capabilities of digital and I was wondering if it will be a viable solution for my enterprise.  I'm asking you what solutions/recommendations have worked best for a digital HylaFAX setup?  My primary goal is to have eight or more outgoing lines and the ability to have two or more rack mount servers for redundancy/fail-over.

 

Thank you very much!

 

Dan