|
Hylafax Mailing List Archives
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:32:35 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: REMOTE best format 2-D MMR
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: REMOTE supports T.30 Annex A, ECM
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: REMOTE best 20 ms, 10 ms/scanline
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: USE 14400 bit/s
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: USE 20 ms, 10 ms/scanline
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: SEND file "docq/doc65.cover;30"
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: USE page width 1728 pixels in 215 mm
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: USE unlimited page length
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: USE 3.85 line/mm
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: USE 1-D MR
Didn't follow all the thread, however, are you using faxgetty?
If not then you have to tell HylaFAX to use 2d with faxmodem.
--
giulioo@pobox.com
____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null
