Re: [hylafax-users] DID revisited

[Yan Seiner <yan@cardinalengineering.com>]

OOPS!  I was not clear.  The NBX-100 makes it possible to interface with 
a TAPI-aware application.  My question was if it was feasible to make 
hylafax TAPI-aware, so that faxes could be handled by hylafax and 
distributed without actually going through a modem.

Now that I restate it, it sounds pretty stupid, so I withdraw the 
question.  ;-)

--Yan

Bernd Proissl wrote:

>>The NBX-100 can use a TAPI interface to route phone calls, including 
>>faxes.  It is theoretically possible to route faxes via TAPI on the 
>>network. 
>>
> 
> Route faxes on which network? phone network behind PBX? computer network?
> 
> TAPI is a standard to control telephony hardware, but not each peace of hardware supports all of TAPI.
> AFAIK you can not use TAPI to control you computer network. How should this be done?
> 
> TAPI is AFAIK an MS standard. Do their exist implementations for one of the platform hylafax runs on?
> 
> 
>>Does such an animal exist for hylafax?  
>>
> AFAIK no
> 
> Bernd
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
>  To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null
> 
> 




____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null