Question about WHFC and active/passive ftp

To: <Ulrich.Eckhardt@transcom.de>
Subject: flexfax: Question about WHFC and active/passive ftp
From: "Bernd Proissl" <news@proissl.de>
Cc: <flexfax@sgi.com>
Reply-To: <news@proissl.de>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 22:01:59 +0200


 
> It's not that bad, if you don't forget to implement passive connections.
> HylaFAX supports it (and WHFC somewhere in the future).
Why does WHFC only use active connections?

Bernd

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about WHFC and active/passive ftp
  - From: Ulrich Eckhardt <Ulrich.Eckhardt@transcom.de>

References:
- Re: Design for a portable Java hylafax clients: i want your opinions, please!
  - From: Ulrich Eckhardt <Ulrich.Eckhardt@transcom.de>

Prev by Date: RE: Design for a portable Java hylafax clients: i want your opinions, please!
Next by Date: RE: Design for a portable Java hylafax clients: i want your opinions, please!
Prev by thread: Re: Design for a portable Java hylafax clients: i want your opinions, please!
Next by thread: Re: Question about WHFC and active/passive ftp
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread

Report any problems to webmaster@hylafax.org

HylaFAX is a trademark of Silicon Graphics Corporation.
Internet connectivity for hylafax.org is provided by:
VirtuALL Private Host Services