Re: [hylafax-users] seeing a lot of "blocked" jobs since upgrading

[offman <offman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

O.K worked fine is maybe a bit subjective.
When handled correctly , with multiple users  it previously was not  
as bad as it is now.
however in future can we have a "base line" , in that we do not  
automatically enable "new features".

steve


On Apr 4, 2006, at 12:06 AM, Aidan Van Dyk wrote:

> * Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [060403 11:50]:
> > offman wrote:
> >
> > > previously job batching was working fine , multiple jobs to the same
> > > dest were being batched correctly.
>
> If you disable the new JobControl feature (set JobControl: "" in
> etc/config), batching will function as previously.  We should probable
> change that to have it disabled by default.
>
> > Current HylaFAX CVS_HEAD at hylafax.org appears to have broken  
> > batching
>
> Note that batching has always been broken and susceptible to various
> problems.    Though it "works" in a manner to allow multiple jobs  
> to go
> to the same destination in a single call (most of the time), it breaks
> the fundamental idea of a job in HylaFAX, and causes problems if you
> allow multiple users to use your HylaFAX server, and expect to be able
> to control modems and parameters of your jobs individually.
>
> a.
>
> --
> Aidan Van Dyk                                              
> aidan@xxxxxxxx
> Senior Software Developer                          +1 215 825-8700  
> x8103
> iFAX Solutions, Inc.                                http:// 
> www.ifax.com/



____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
 *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*