Re: [hylafax-users] modem selection

[An Intrepid HylaFax User <hylafax@xxxxxxxxx>]

Quoting Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> In any case, I completely disagree with the perception that fax 
> machines are, by nature, better than a fax modem and software 
> combination.  

I am just going by call completion rates and how many destinations were able
to receive a fax w/o redialling or abject failures.

> The HylaFAX servers that I administer are significantly 
> more interoperable and reliable than was the Canon fax machine that I 
> used before looking into HylaFAX.

You're a fortunate man, or an unlucky Canon owner.

> The biggest feature difference between most fax machines and most 
> peoples' HylaFAX installations - with respect to fax protocol - is 
> ECM.

For sending as well as receiving?

I've actually had little issues with receiving faxes properly, but then
again my needs in this area are minute compared to the outbound direction.

> 4.1.7 and 4.1.8 were no different from 4.1.6 except for a fix-up of 
> Page Chopping support (which was accidentally broken in 4.1.6) and a 
> minor security matter.  So all of the past year of efforts from the 
> -devel team cannot be found except in CVS HEAD.

Eeesh.

=R=


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
  To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
 On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
  *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxxxxx*