Re: [hylafax-users] -k Problems

["Sid Lambert" <sid@jsisign.com>]

I upgraded to 4.1.1 from 4.1 and used "now + 300 hours" and it is working.
Where is this format documented?

Thank you Lee.

Sid Lambert
JSI Sign Systems Div
http://www.jsisign.com



----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Howard" <faxguy@deanox.com>
To: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@baylink.com>
Cc: <hylafax-users@hylafax.org>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 1:53 AM
Subject: Re: [hylafax-users] -k Problems


> On 2002.03.14 20:22 Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 04:42:50PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > > This has been broken for a LONG time; I reported this as a problem
more
> > than
> > > two years ago and I am not surprised if it is STILL broken, as I don't
> > > recall anything in release notes indicating that it has been found and
> > fixed.
> > >
> > > It essentially prevented me from using Hylafax for batch delivery of
> > > invoices and such at my former company, since the system would queue
> > all of
> > > them at once and invariably a huge number of them would get killed by
> > the
> > > scheduler without ever being attempted.
> >
> > If I correctly understand the complaint, yes, this has been fixed for
> > quite some time.  Lee, ISTR you being in the thick of this topic for
> > Hawai'i, no?
>
> I believe that you're referring to what sparked Bugzilla bug 160.  That's
> been resolved as of 4.1.1, officially.  I think, though, that the original
> poster is complaining about a misunderstanding of "at format" for
killtime.
>
> Lee.
>
> ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List
_______________________
>  To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org <
/dev/null
>
>
>


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null