Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.

[Joe Matuscak <matuscak@rohrer.com>]

On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Giulio Orsero wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:05:31 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
>
> >Interestingly, when I manually converted the ps file the tffg4 output was
> >larger than the tiffg32d. Not what I would have expected.
>
> In my case
>
> -rw-rw----   1 go       go          12836 Sep  6 16:22 test.ps
> -rw-rw----   1 go       go          14761 Sep  6 19:43 test_3.tif
> -rw-rw----   1 go       go          11474 Sep  6 19:43 test_32d.tif
> -rw-rw----   1 go       go           7556 Sep  6 19:43 test_4.tif

OK, maybe I messed up my ghostscript command. What options did you use to
generate the files above?

Thanks,

Joe Matuscak
Rohrer Corporation
717 Seville Road
Wadsworth, Ohio 44281
(330)335-1541
matuscak@rohrer.com




____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null