Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.

To: Joe Matuscak <matuscak@rohrer.com>
Subject: Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
From: "Vyacheslav Frolov" <v.frolov@globalone.ru>
Cc: Lee Howard <faxguy@deanox.com>, hylafax-users@hylafax.org
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 13:55:56 +0400

Joe Matuscak wrote:

> Sep 05 17:06:32.37: [  959]: REMOTE best format 2-D MMR

...

> Sep 05 17:06:32.37: [  959]: USE 2-D MR

REMOTE supports MMR so if the regular fax machine supports MMR too then
HylaFAX performance will less (up to twice).

Vyacheslav.

____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
  - From: Joe Matuscak

References:
- Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
  - From: Joe Matuscak

Prev by Date: Re: [hylafax-users] faxing thru staroffice
Next by Date: Re: [hylafax-users] Hylafax API : Howto make sure it sends a cover page
Previous by thread: Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
Next by thread: Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread

Report any problems to webmaster@hylafax.org

HylaFAX is a trademark of Silicon Graphics Corporation.
Internet connectivity for hylafax.org is provided by:
VirtuALL Private Host Services