|
Hylafax Mailing List Archives
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
Re: [hylafax-users] Received faxed cut to few lines
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Lee Howard wrote:
> At 11:20 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Tim Rice wrote:
> >On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Lee Howard wrote:
> >
> >> At 01:33 PM 2/2/01 +0100, mamboman@gmx.ch wrote:
> >>
> >> >I am using:
> >> >Hylafax 4 Beta 2-l35
> >> >libtiff 3.4-0
> >> >tiff 3.4-0
> >> >on Suse Linux 6.4 i386
> >>
> >> Yeah, libtiff/HylaFAX incompatibility. You need libtiff 3.5.x.
> >>
> >
> >libtiff 3.4 should be fine.
> >In fact the pre CVS code base requires it.
>
> Okay, I could be wrong, but I *thought* that SuSE RPM hylafax-4.1beta2-135
> was a binary created from CVS by the SuSE folk. And because they compiled
> it on a system with libtiff-3.5.x, it is necessary to use libtiff-3.5.x if
> you're using the RPM.
>
> At least, that's the way it appeared when I reviewed the latest versions at
> SuSE a number of months ago.
You are probably right.
I keep thinking in terms of compiling from source.
Wouldn't a binary RPM complain on the about the wrong version of libtiff?
I supose the user could have done a --nodeps
>
> Lee.
>
--
Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 887-1469
tim@multitalents.net
____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null
