Hylafax Mailing List Archives
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
Re: HylaFAX 4.0pl1: Use multiple modems for sending alpha-pages?
Digi Realport Drivers look just like actual LOCAL terminal ports. With
full control over the signals. Now I would recommend that the faxmodems
be class 2 at least because of network issues. When I had HylaFAX working
here I used realport drivers, and both 14.4 Sportsters, and Telebit
Worldblazer modems.
Bill Suetholz
>
>On Wed, 11 Feb 1998, Nico Garcia wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On Tue, 10 Feb 1998, Paul Dugas wrote:
>
> > For my first fax/paging server, I setup HylaFAX on my SPARC Solaris machine
> > using a single USR 28,800 Fax modem. Works great. My customer, the Georgia
> > DOT, is using it for personnel notifications of traffic problems. It's
> > become very popular and the single modem won't hack it so I added a couple
> > more and thought I was done!
>
> GOOD! You might also want to publish any changes you had to make on
> your USR's config files.
>
> > the same server. I know it will have to make a call for each one but does it
> > have to do so on the same modem? Can't it spin up all three at once? I've
>
> It should be able to. How do you submit faxes? As text, Postscript, or
> TIFF files? And do you have funky things in your config files like
> ModemClass, which should be set to blank?
>
> > what I'm seeing. I've even tried running three 'sendpage' jobs to three
> > different pager centrals with three different pin numbers but they still end
> > up on the first modem.
>
> > The details:
> > Sun SPARC Ultra
> > Solaris 2.5.1
> > HylaFAX v4.0pl1
> > One USR Sportster 28,800 (on cua/b)
> > Two MultiTech MT2834BR (on remote Digi PortServerII using their RealPort
> > drivers)
>
> WHOA RIGHT HERE! Try swapping the modems around. Put your Multitech
> modems on cua/b, see if they work there. Also be aware that HylaFAX
> isn't guaranteed to work remote terminal servers, for a lot of
> reasons.
>
> Try moving the USR over to ther remote server as well, and see what
> you get there. It just might be a modem configuration problem.
>
> Nico Garcia
> Engineer, CIRL
> Mass. Eye and Ear Infirmary
> raoul@cirl.meei.harvard.edu
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
>
> iQCVAwUBNOHKWT/+ItycgIJRAQG3FAQAgklZx9/mW5AomOu1fUQysR7PyxOnAfqY
> P2dAaOpSAnaH3Vsq50Vde0ahClX5wshaLMUK0nBwiJO7NmwuZ8LfKejybbM41YAr
> Au62NB8NIDGmn2JulyEkhimXUlDa6/zJD2GstRDyTz5OBXCseznMu/kFUQApZ49Y
> zaO2arWUj+g=
> =Q7lF
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>